Meanwhile, Managing director Datuk Dr Aw Yuan Meng had been redesignated vice-chairman

[Nikkei Daily Business(28/7/2009)]

·          Posted revenue of RM23.65 million for the first quarter ended 30 June 2009, a 5 per cent increase from RM22.52 million registered in the previous corresponding quarter. Net property income for the period grew marginally to RM15.23 million compared to RM15.07 million in the corresponding period last year,

·          Profit after tax rose 10 per cent to RM10.58 million against RM9.60 million before. Earnings per unit was 2.47 sen.

The improved performance arose from the contribution of income derived from positive rental reversions recorded from its three properties – Kelana Brem Towers, The Summit Subang USJ and Menara AmBank.The first quarter financial results was considered good when compared against the current global economic slowdown which also impacted the REITs industry worldwide. According to chief executive officer Lim Yoon Peng, AmFIRST Reit  is able to continue to attract and retain quality tenants, thus generating steady rental income for the Trust. For this year, the manager has lined up enhancement and repositioning works for its properties. The first building involved – Menara Merais in Petaling Jaya – should see its renovation works completed by November this yearBT:24/8/2009

Malaysia with 11 REITS has a USD1.43bil in market capitalization which is way behind others like Singapore (USD15.1bil); Hong Kong(USD8.3bil); Taiwan(USD1.53bi) and Thailand(USD1.52bil)

[ For the Malaysia REITs, it has still not included the about to list Sunway City Bhd (Rm3.7bil) and CapitaLand Ltd’s retail REIT(first foreign sponsored REIT on Bursa Malaysia)

Below are the top 10 Asian REITs by market capitalization(USD’bil):

Some of the REITS had bounced back from their lows in December last year and some are showing remarkable growth in total returns(capital appreciation and high dividend yield

Description Of the to be acquired building:

• Kenanga International sits on a parcel of freehold land measuring about 6,704 sq metres,
• Is a 22-storey commercial building with three-and -half storey annexed podium block and six split level car park decks
• Has a total net lettable area of about 297,511 sq feet (2.76 hectares).

REIT said the property was currently undergoing refurbishment and upgrading works, after which it would have additional lettable area of about 70,000 sq feet.

(Source: The EdgeDaily 25-9-08)

• REIT would now be able to acquire property under construction or uncompleted real estate. However, a REIT is only allowed to acquire property under construction or uncompleted real estates up to 10% of their total asset value.
• REITs still cannot acquire non-income generating real estates such as vacant land.
• More freedom for REIT managers to invest in foreign real estate
• Allowing a portion of a REIT’s portfolio to consist of properties it does not wholly own or have majority ownership.
• REIT managers had to appoint a designated person responsible for compliance. This is to ensure that securities laws, land laws and guidelines and rules are complied with at all times.
• On the issue of units for cash (other than rights issue), the number of units to be issued must not exceed 20% of the approved fund size while the placement to one single placee must not exceed 10% of the approved fund size.
• Foreigners can now own up to 70% of the real estate investment trusts (REIT) management companies, up from 49% since 2005.

According to experts, benefits/effects accruing from the above are:

• REITS are able to acquire partially completed building REIT could now participate in the construction too. A REIT will then be able to buy assets at a lower price and if there is a contracted tenant, as a result the REIT can obtain higher yield.
• There are some clear move that that SC’s is moving toward enhancing corporate governance among REITs, including the setting up of internal auditors and the harmonising of the rules for REITs was good.
• The SC’s conditions for issuance of units for cash other than rights issues-this could hinder the capital raising exercises of smaller REITs whose fund size is less than RM100mil. However, this ruling would not have an effect on the larger players.
• REIT managers would have more freedom to invest in foreign real estates.
• It also allowed a portion of a REIT’s portfolio to consist of real estates that it does not wholly own or have a majority ownership.
• REIT Managers are now able to raise funds faster for acquisitions or capital expenditure purposes
• REIT Managers are now allow to seek a general mandate from unit holders for issuance of units up to 20% of its fund size. Previously, the issuance of any number of new units required REIT Managers to hold meetings to seek unit holders’ specific approval.

They viewed that the relaxation of certain REIT’s rules are crucial to the development of the Malaysian REITs due to:

• Malaysian properties are still relatively cheaper than our neighbours like Singapore, Hong Kong and China where there is upside potential in asset revaluation or further capital growth and
• That the Malaysian REITs also offer more attractive yields than the Singaporean counterparts, with some offering yields as high as 8% and 9%, compared with around 5% or 6% offered by Singapore REITs,

So what’s are some of their wish lists:

1.0 Firstly, they hope that the Malaysian government would review the withholding tax in the Budget 2009. Once the withholding tax is abolished or revised downwards (comparable to Singapore, the industry will improve further. (Neighbouring Singapore is frequently viewed as the more attractive destination for investment due to its lower withholding tax for foreign investors at 10% versus the 20% applicable to

2.0 Next, the hope that the government would  allow Malaysian REITs to invest in development projects. Incidentally in Malaysia, REITs are not permitted to invest in development projects but only in completed properties, which some players feel closes the door on opportunities to gain cheaper entries, thus maximising yields. It is understood that the Securities Commission may review this, however, there is still no official word.

3.0 Last but not least, the REIT players also welcome being allowed to manage their own REITs, currently not possible under the Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents Act 1981 that they are bound to. Under Section 21 of the Act, only registered valuers and appraisers are allowed to manage a property on behalf of the owner for a fee, a ruling which also applies to the management of REITs. The reasons being the REIT players believed firstly they themselves have the necessary expertise to run their own REITs and that they also believed that there is presently a scarcity of valuers with sector-specific experience related to REITs.

(Source: The Edgedaily.com 25/5/08)